If there is one aspect that is proportionally different from my rough draft to final paper is the length. I will admit that my rough draft was more or else “Half-Assed” I practically did it the same morning it was due. Nevertheless it helped me create a better final paper. It really showed the flaws that I would make for a paper that was done in 30 minute time; Grammatical errors where all over the place, spelling errors, repetitive information, and an abrupt ending.
I made big changes with my rough draft to my final paper. One was the length of the work; another is a more organized train of thoughts, more descriptive events, and an ending that would fit well with the rest of the paper. I made these changes so that I would not completely fail my final paper, if I had not, I’m afraid even my professor would laugh me out of class.
After revising my rough draft I was able to find a lot of errors such as spelling, grammatical errors, run-on sentences, and repetitive information that seemed to go nowhere. I reread my paper for most of my revisions, only looking back to the peer-review to get an outside perspective into the matter. I did not use the peer-review much mainly because it was a shitty paper and I knew it. The peer-review would only point out things that I would already know about the paper and get me nowhere in the end.
The strongest points on my final paper has to be the flashback events of me in grade school and how those events changed my feelings towards the book Holes and future assigned readings. The weakest is my ending as I was not too sure on how to end the paper. I felt that I could have ended it a lot better than it turned out to be.